A clearer bid.
Before you submit.
Compare a school renovation tender with your proposal.
Find gaps, see the evidence, and decide what to fix.
1Buyer’s requirements
The tender and its supporting documents.
2Your proposal
Your quote, work plan and attachments.
Up to 5 files on each side · 24,000 readable characters total. Scanned PDFs need OCR first. Text is sent to Cominty for analysis; buyer documents are stored in a private collection.
Public demo · Use sample or non-confidential files. Live reviews are limited; the completed example remains available.
Previous reviews
Checking your proposal
Starting…
A full review can take a few minutes. Keep this page open.
Turn gaps into actions.
Your approved correction plans, with evidence attached.
One last check.
Before a costly omission.
For the person preparing a building contractor’s tender response.
A practical example
A French nursery school must be renovated during school holidays. The contractor’s draft schedules work during term time. TenderCheck shows the source rule and the proposed dates, then creates a correction task.
Three simple steps
- Add the buyer’s tender and your proposal, or load the labelled example.
- Cominty retrieves the buyer’s requirements and compares them with your proposal. Open a finding to see the exact document, page and quote.
- Review the suggested corrections, then create your action plan. Update task status and export it for your team.
What powers the review?
The app uses the Cominty SDK and a private Managed Agent. Buyer documents are indexed in Cominty for retrieval (RAG). Every cited quote is checked against the supplied page before a result is saved. Requirements come from your documents, not a fixed checklist.
What it can—and cannot—check
It checks written work scope, timing, payment terms and requested documents. It cannot validate engineering safety, signatures, certificate authenticity or legal compliance. A missing item means “not found in these files.” Include applicable amendments; this prototype does not search for them.
The example uses the full consultation rules for the renovation of Revel nursery school in Isère, France. The tender closed on 3 December 2021. The fictional contractor responds to lot 1: façade insulation. The CCTP, CCAP, plans and later amendments are not included, so this is a submission-rules review, not a full technical audit. Nothing is submitted to the buyer. Reviews and plans are separated by a secure browser cookie, valid for 30 days. This is not an account: use the same browser to return, and avoid shared computers. Extracted buyer text and proposal conversations are sent to the demo owner’s private Cominty workspace. Use sample or non-confidential documents. Hosting is Cloudflare; all AI analysis is Cominty.